![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Also, I have Razvedki carried in by Mi-24. As with my first deck, recon is T-55s, because although lower-quality, two whole allocations of them can cover a large portion of the map. Also, for AA, I have a LOT of Tunguskas, a few ZSU-23-4s of both variants, and some not entirely AA dedicated vehicles, like the BTR-152 with the 4 KPVT machineguns, and the ZSU-23-4 Afganskiy tanks to support the (Now dismounted) infantry in urban areas with fire support and light AA duties.ġst Guards Independent Heavy Tank DivisionĮmphasizes combined arms to an extent, but generally favors using only the finest Soviet machinery, such as the T-80BV (Or whichever the highest quality variant is) with T-80As, highest quality variants of T-72/64/62/55 held in reserve, supported by 3 allocations of Motostrelki brought to bear in BMP-2Ds, Sapery '85, etc. I have BMP-Ts allocated, along with PT-76Bs and other assorted lighter vehicles to support the main advance in flanking attacks.Īir support is very limited, I think the only air support I have allocated is the MI-24s that carry my Spetsnaz for behind-the-lines activities. Scout vehicles are pretty much just T-55s, again, emphasizing mass amounts of lower-quality vehicles. The grenade launcher helps in urban areas, and there is no reason to have an ATGM on a BMP if there are supporting tanks. I'm hoping my experience of other RTS will carry over, influencing my unit choice in my decks.Įmphasizes combined arms, with mass amounts of on-par tanks (T-55A, lowest variants of T-62/64/72) in support of my 3 entire allocations of Motostrelki brought in by BMP-1D. I got this game a few days ago, and am really liking it. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |